Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÃøµÎ¾Ç°üÀý ÀâÀ½ÀÚÀÇ ¼öÆò¸é»ó ÇÏ¾Ç ÆíÀ§ ¿îµ¿¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A study on the mandibular eccentric movement of the subjects with TMJ click in horizontal plane

±¸°­»ý¹°Çבּ¸ 1992³â 16±Ç 2È£ p.279 ~ 291
³ª°æ¼±, °­µ¿¿Ï,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
³ª°æ¼± ( Na Kyung-Seon ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
°­µ¿¿Ï ( Kang Dong-Wan ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


Although Pantograph has been used to investigate whether the determinents of the mandibular movement were possible contributing factors of TMJ click, there was the problems to understand the role of tooth morphology upon the occurrence of click
because
of using appliance without tooth contacts. There were advantages to evaluate to evaluate the effects of tooth morphology upon the mandibular movements, because intraoral tracing device (Functiograph(r)) had been obtained maintaining occlusal
contact
between the upper and lower natural teeth during mandibular movement.
The purpose of this study was to record the mandibular eccentric movement quantitatively performed in 20 adult control subjects and 20 adult subjects with TMJ click and to investigate the effects of occlusion upon the occurrence of TMJ click.
@ES The obtained results were as follows:
@EN 1. The average ICP-RCP slide distance 2.79¡¾0.73§® in subjects with TMJ click, 2.14 0.85§® in control subjects. There was a statistical significance between subjects with TMJ click and control subjects(P<0.001).
2. The average ICP-P distance was 3.07¡¾1.14§® in subjects with TMJ click, 2,61¡¾0.95§® in control subjects. There was a statistical significance between subjects with TMJ click and control subjects(P<0.05).
3. The average distance of right and left lateral movement was not statistically significant between subjects with TMJ click and control subjects.
4. The average lateral displacement from midline during RCP was 0.75¡¾0.54§® subjects with TMJ click, 0.16¡¾0.17§® in control subjects. There was a statistical significance between subjects with TMJ click and control subjects(P<0.001).
5. The average angle of right and left lateral movement was 144.2¡¾20.20¡Æin subjects with TMJ click, 138.15¡¾20.09¡Æin control subjects. There was a statistical significance between subjects with TMJ click and control subjects (P<0.05).

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI